WALLACE: President Trump, changing just a little bit, but same region, said this week that South Korea should pay for the missile defense system that we have installed there, the THAAD system, $1 billion. There is a report today that you called your South Korean counterpart and said, no, the old agreement was that we the United States pay that billion dollars and we’re going to stick by that.
Is that true?
MCMASTER: Well, the last thing I would ever do is contradict the president of the United States, you know? But -- and that's not what it was. In fact, what I told our South Korean counterpart is until any renegotiation that the deal is in place. We’ll adhere to our word.
But what the president has asked us to do is to look across all of our alliances and to have appropriate burden-sharing, responsibility-sharing. We are looking at that with a great ally, South Korea. We’re looking at that with NATO.
And what you’ve seen because of the president's leadership, more and more nations are contributing more to our collective defense.
WALLACE: So, the question of who pays the billion dollars is still up in the air?
MCMASTER: The question of what is the relationship on THAAD, on our defense relationship going forward, will be renegotiated as it’s going to be with all of our allies. Because what the president has said is, he will prioritize American citizens' security and interests. And to do that, we need strong alliances. But also to do that effectively, and a way that is sustainable economically, we need everybody to pay their fair share.
------------------------------------------------
요약-> 미국의 재협상의 여지는 사드 자체라기보다는, 동맹국가들에 대한 방위분담금이란 트럼프 대통령의 주요 이슈를 이야기 했다는 소리인데, 국내 언론은 그냥 재협상 여지를 밝혀서 김관진의 말과 모순된다고 말도 안되는 해석을 때려박았네요.
이 무슨 해괴망측한...
'But what the president has asked us to do is to look across all of our alliances and to have appropriate burden-sharing, responsibility-sharing. We are looking at that with a great ally, South Korea. We’re looking at that with NATO.'
'그러나 대통령이 우리에게 요구한 것은 모든 동맹 관계를 살펴보고 적절하게 부담과 책임을 공유 하는 것입니다. 우리는 위대한 동맹국인 한국과 함께 그것을 보고 있습니다. NATO도 함께 그것을 보고 있고요.'
결론은 국내 기사가 원문의 문맥, 어조, 어투 다 씹어드시고 문장 하나 찝어서 논란 일으켰다는 것 밖에는 이야기가 되지 않습니다.
어쩌면 다 알면서도 기사거리, 논란거리 만들어서 조회수 좀 늘려보려는 걸 수도 있고요
http://m.blog.naver.com/kkumi17cs1013/220995988719
작성일 : 17-05-02 12:00
조회 : 1,952
